|
When a couple ends their relationship,
it becomes necessary that they apportion their property and any obligations between
themselves. Much of the time, determining who gets what is a relatively
straightforward matter. For a wide variety of reasons, however, parties to a divorce
often find agreement on such issues to be elusive. At the other end of the spectrum,
an apparently easy settlement agreement may be fraught with hidden problems, such as
unexpected tax ramifications or misunderstood valuation of assets, which, once understood,
may render the seemingly fair property division quite inequitable. For these reasons, we highly recommend that any proposed agreement
regarding division of community assets and debts be reviewed by a competent family law
attorney. The expression an ounce of prevention is worth of pound of
cure applies here. The identification, characterization (whether an asset is
community property or separate property), valuation and fair division of marital property
is often trickier than it seems, and the cost of a consultation or review will be
negligible compared to the potential cost of a mistake of law and fact that becomes
embedded in a signed agreement.
While parties may make any settlement of the marital estate that
seems fair to them, under California law each party is entitled to receive an equal share
(by value) of the community property accumulated during marriage. Community
property includes virtually anything of value acquired by dint of the earnings or
efforts of the parties while married, such as real estate, personal property, vehicles,
bank accounts or other investments, retirement benefits, business interests, royalty
payments, and stock options, to name just a few. Assets owned prior to marriage or
acquired during the marriage by gift or inheritance (i.e. not through earnings or efforts)
are considered the separate property of the owner and not subject to equal division on
divorce. It may be that some assets are a combination of community property and
separate property. For example, retirement benefits or stock options may have been
acquired by a combination of community (during marriage) and separate (before marriage or
after separation) efforts. As another example, a home or a car may have been
acquired with a combination of community and separate funds. Because life is
complicated, the law has developed many rules and exceptions to the rules in an attempt to
fairly deal with a variety of commonly recurring situations which affect the valuation and
distribution of marital assets.
Mr. Weiler and Mr. Borst specialize in helping their clients
through these rules and assisting in the negotiation of agreements that are fair to BOTH
parties. And where one side is less powerful or does not have access to the necessary
information about community assets or obligations, our attorneys will ensure full
discovery and disclosure of relevant facts, and will aggressively pursue on behalf of the
client an appropriate division of the estate.
|
|